Expert Analysis: Feldbausch vs. Weis Tennis Match
This upcoming match between Kilian Feldbausch and Alexander Weis promises to be an intriguing encounter. Both players have shown strong performances in recent tournaments, but their playing styles suggest a competitive edge that could lead to a closely contested match. Feldbausch is known for his aggressive baseline play, while Weis has demonstrated resilience and strategic prowess on the court. The betting odds reflect this anticipated intensity, with predictions leaning towards a longer match.
Feldbausch, Kilian
Weis, Alexander
(FT)
Predictions:
Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Over 1st Set Games | 65.50% | (2-0) 7-5 1st Set 1.50 | |
Under 1st Set Games | 70.70% | (2-0) 7-5 1st Set 1.62 | |
Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 92.50% | (2-0) | |
Tie Break in Match (No) | 80.60% | (2-0) | |
Under 2.5 Sets | 70.70% | (2-0) | |
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 61.50% | (2-0) | |
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) | 54.30% | (2-0) |
Set Predictions
The odds suggest a high probability of the first set extending beyond the typical nine games, with the ‘Over 1st Set Games’ at 60.10. This indicates that both players are likely to engage in lengthy rallies, pushing each other to their limits. Conversely, the ‘Under 1st Set Games’ at 67.90 suggests a possibility of a quicker set if one player manages to break the other early on.
Tie-break scenarios are also noteworthy. The odds for no tie-break in the first set stand at 93.50, hinting at a decisive break of serve early in the set. For the entire match, the ‘Tie Break in Match (No)’ at 81.10 implies that one player might secure a clear advantage in one of the sets, potentially avoiding a tie-break altogether.
Match Duration and Game Totals
The prediction for ‘Under 2.5 Sets’ at 70.60 suggests that while both players are capable of enduring long matches, there’s a strong chance the match will conclude within three sets. This could be due to either player’s ability to capitalize on crucial moments or simply due to fatigue affecting performance as the match progresses.
Regarding total games, the ‘Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)’ at 63.10 indicates a lean towards fewer games overall, possibly due to one player’s dominance in serving or break opportunities. Meanwhile, ‘Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)’ at 54.90 supports this view, suggesting that swift sets could occur if either player manages to maintain control throughout.