The Ice-Hockey Extraleague Belarus is set to deliver an exhilarating day of matches tomorrow, promising intense competition and strategic gameplay. Fans and bettors alike are eagerly anticipating the action as top-tier teams clash on the ice. This article delves into the details of the upcoming matches, offering expert betting predictions and insights to enhance your viewing experience. Whether you're a seasoned enthusiast or new to the sport, get ready for a day filled with high-stakes drama and athletic prowess.
The Extraleague is renowned for its competitive spirit, featuring some of the best teams in Belarus. Each team brings its unique strengths and strategies to the rink, making every game unpredictable and exciting. As we approach tomorrow's matches, let's explore the key players, team dynamics, and potential outcomes that could influence betting odds.
Tomorrow's schedule includes several highly anticipated matchups. Here's a breakdown of the key games:
With the stakes high and the competition fierce, expert analysts have weighed in on potential outcomes for each match. Here are some betting predictions to consider:
Analysts predict a close game with a slight edge for Team A due to their offensive prowess. Bettors might consider placing bets on Team A to win with a total score over 5 goals.
With Team C's star player returning, there's a strong possibility they could upset Team D's winning streak. A bet on Team C to win or push could be a savvy choice.
Given the history between these teams, expect a high-scoring affair. Betting on both teams to score over 3 goals each could be a lucrative option.
Several players are poised to make a significant impact in tomorrow's games:
Each team will need to leverage its strengths while addressing any weaknesses to secure victory. Here are some tactical insights for each matchup:
Team A should focus on maintaining possession and capitalizing on power plays. Meanwhile, Team B needs to tighten their defense and look for counter-attacking opportunities.
Team C will benefit from utilizing their star player effectively while maintaining defensive discipline. Team D should aim to disrupt Team C's rhythm and exploit any gaps in their defense.
Both teams are likely to adopt an aggressive approach, so controlling the pace of the game will be key. Quick transitions and effective communication will be vital for success.
Several factors could influence the outcome of tomorrow's matches:
To maximize your betting potential, consider these strategies:
For fans looking to enhance their experience, here are some tips:
Strategy plays a pivotal role in ice-hockey, influencing everything from line changes to power play formations. Teams that adapt quickly to in-game developments often gain an upper hand.
Coaches are instrumental in shaping team strategy and morale. Their decisions during timeouts can turn the tide of a game.
Fans play a crucial role in energizing teams and creating an electrifying atmosphere at games.
<|repo_name|>blessedwithchicken/tex<|file_sep|>/Lecture Notes/CS230/notes/chapter-7.tex
chapter{Recurrence Relations}
section{Recurrence Relations}
A recurrence relation is an equation that defines a sequence recursively: each term of
the sequence is defined as some function of preceding terms.
subsection{Example}
The Fibonacci sequence is defined by:
begin{itemize}
item $F_0 = F_1 =1$
item $F_n = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2} text{ for } n geqslant2$
end{itemize}
What is $F_5$?
begin{align*}
F_5 &= F_4 + F_3 \
&= (F_3 + F_2) + (F_2 + F_1) \
&= ((F_2 + F_1) + (F_1 + F_0)) + ((F_1 + F_0) + F_1) \
&= (((F_1 + F_0) + F_1) + (F_1 + F_0)) + ((F_1 + F_0) + F_1) \
&= ((((F_0 + F_{-1}) + F_0) + (F_0 + F_{-1})) + ((F_0 + F_{-1}) +
F_0)) + ((F_0 + F_{-1})+F_0)) \
&= ((((0+(-1)) +0)+ (0+(-1))) +
((0+(-1))+0)+((0+(-1))+0))\
&= textbf{8}
end{align*}
To solve this recurrence relation we first need an initial condition which tells us
what $T(0)$ is equal too.
If we want to solve it using repeated substitution we would start by substituting
the recurrence relation into itself until we reach our base case.
The big issue with this method is that it only works if our base case has $T(0)$
as one of it's parameters.
Let us look at another example:
begin{align*}
T(n) &= T(n - sqrt{n})+n &text{if } n >10\
T(n)&=2 & text{if } n leqslant10\
end{align*}
This doesn't work because we will never reach our base case which is when $n leqslant10$.
A better way would be expanding around our base case.
begin{align*}
T(n) &= T(n-sqrt{n})+n \
&= T(n-sqrt{n}-sqrt{n-sqrt{n}})+(n-sqrt{n})+n \
&= T(n-sqrt{n}-sqrt{n-sqrt{n}}-sqrt{n-sqrt{n}-sqrt{n-sqrt{n}}})+(n-sqrt{n}-sqrt{n-sqrt{n}})+n-(sqrt{n})\
&= ldots\
&= T(10)+ sum_{i=1}^{k} n - sum_{i=1}^{k}sqrt{n-sum_{j=1}^{i-1}sqrt{n}}
end{align*}
We want our recurrence relation so that when we substitute it into itself we get closer
and closer towards our base case until we reach it.
We can solve this problem by using induction.
Let us take another example:
$T(n) = T(frac{n}{2})+c$
We want:
$n = (frac{n}{2})^k$
This is equivalent to:
$n = (frac{1}{2})^k n$
And this gives us:
$k = log n$
So we have $k$ recursive calls where each call takes constant time so our time complexity is $Theta(log n)$
What if our recurrence relation was $T(n)=2T(frac{n}{2})+cn$?
The same process would give us $k = log n$
But now we have $2^k$ recursive calls where each call takes linear time so our time complexity is $Theta(n log n)$
This method works well but what if we had something like:
$T(n)=aT(frac{n}{b})+cn^d$
How do we figure out what our time complexity would be then?
We can use something called textbf{textit{Master Method}}
The Master Method helps us solve recurrences like $T(n)=aT(frac{n}{b})+f(n)$ where $a geqslant1$, $b >1$,
and $f(n)$ is asymptotically positive.
We define $log_b(a)$ as $frac{log(a)}{log(b)}$
The Master Method says that:
Let $f(n)$ be asymptotically positive i.e., there exist positive constants $c$, and $n_epsilon$ such that
$f(n) geqslant cn^epsilon$ for all $n geqslant n_epsilon$.
Then
$$
T(n)=
begin{cases}
Theta(n^{log_b(a)}) & f(n)=O(n^{log_b(a)-epsilon})\
Theta(f(n)log n)& f(n)=Theta(n^{log_b(a)})\
Theta(f(n)) & f(n)=Omega(n^{log_b(a)+epsilon})
\
& text{(regularity condition: }af(frac{n}{b}) leqslant kf(n)text{ for some constant } k<1)
\
& text{(regularity condition: }af(frac{n}{b}) leqslant kf(n)text{ for all large enough }n)
\
& text{(for all large enough }n)
\
& text{(if both conditions apply then choose smallest bound)}
end{cases}
$$
If none of these apply then master method does not apply.
We need three cases because there are three possibilities:
$f(n)$ grows slower than $n^{log_b(a)}$, or at about same rate as $n^{log_b(a)}$, or faster than $n^{log_b(a)}$
Case I: If $f(n)$ grows slower than $n^{log_b(a)}$, then it doesn't contribute much towards overall cost so cost depends mostly on cost incurred at root which is $Theta((n^{log_b(a)})$ since tree has height $log_b (n)$
Case II: If $f(n)$ grows at about same rate as $n^{log_b(a)}$, then cost at every level becomes comparable hence total cost becomes sum of costs at all levels i.e., $Theta(f(n)log n)$
Case III: If $f(n)$ grows faster than $n^{log_b(a)}$, then cost at leaves become comparable hence total cost becomes $Theta(f(n))$
For example:
Let us take:
$T(1)=c$, where c is constant
$T(2)=a+b$
and
$T(2^n)=aT(2^{n-1})+bn$
Then
$$
T(2^n)=
a^n T(2^0)+bn+ldots+bna^{n-2}+bna^{n-1}\
=a^n c+sum_{i=0}^{n-1} bna^{i}\
=a^n c+bna^{n}sum_{i=0}^{n-1}frac{1}{a^{i}}\
=a^n c+frac{(bn)(a^{n}-a^{-i})}{a-1}\
=a^n c+frac{(bn)(a^{n}-a^{-i})}{a-1}\
=Theta(an)+c=Theta(an)
$$
If we substitute $Theta(an)$ into itself then it doesn't make sense because it doesn't converge towards our base case.
In general if you have two recursive subproblems whose sizes sum up exactly equal original problem size then you don't need Master Method because you can just solve it using repeated substitution which gives you answer $Theta(an+c)$ where c is number of subproblems solved independently without recursion.
So now let us look at another example using Master Method:
Let us take
$$T(2^n)=aT(2^{n-1})+bn$$
Which gives us
$a=2$, $b=2$, $epsilon=0$
So we have:
$alpha=log_b(a)=log_a(2)=frac{log(2)}{log(2)}=1$
And since $alpha=epsilon$, Case II applies so
$$T(2^n)=Theta(f(2^n)cdot log(2^n))=Theta(bnn log(2^n))=Theta(bnn^{alpha+1})$$
And since this holds true also when substituting back into original recurrence relation,
$$T(2^n)=aT(2^{n-1})+bn=Theta(an^alpha+bnn^epsilon)=Theta(an^alpha+bnn^alpha)=Theta(an^alpha+bnn^alpha)=O(an^alpha+bnn^alpha)$$
So finally,
$$O(T(2^n))=Theta(bnn^{alpha+1})$$
Now let us look at another example:
Let us take
$$T(9^n)=5T(9^{n/6})+9^{7/8}cdot n$$
Which gives us:
$a=5$, $b=9$, $epsilon=frac{-15}{8}$ , since $alpha>epsilon$, Case III applies so
$f(9^n)in Omega((9^n)^{alpha+epsilon}=9^{-15/8}$)
And since regularity condition holds true as well,
$f(frac {9^n}{9}) = f({9^{n-6}})